[Rwanda Forum] La guerre diplomatique et militaire du Rwanda en RDC : intensification des offensives du M23/RDF pendant les voyages de Paul Kagame et Felix Tshisekedi

La guerre diplomatique et militaire du Rwanda en RDC : intensification des offensives du M23/RDF pendant les voyages de  Paul Kagame et Felix Tshisekedi, et les attitudes déguisées d'un dirigeant dont les stratégies sont pourtant connues de tous

Depuis plus de deux décennies, la crise de l'Est de la République démocratique du Congo s'inscrit dans un jeu géopolitique complexe où les dynamiques militaires, les stratégies diplomatiques et les discours politiques se croisent, se contredisent et se masquent mutuellement. Au centre de ces contradictions se trouve un phénomène que de nombreux chercheurs, diplomates, journalistes d'investigation et organismes internationaux ont documenté : les offensives du M23 — groupe armé soutenu selon plusieurs rapports par l'armée rwandaise (RDF) — s'intensifient précisément lorsque Paul Kagame est en voyage à l'étranger.

Plus récemment, une tendance similaire a émergé : les offensives du M23/RDF s'accélèrent également lorsque le président congolais Félix Tshisekedi se trouve hors du pays, soit pour des réunions internationales, des sommets politiques ou des missions diplomatiques.

Ces deux réalités, lorsqu'elles sont combinées, dévoilent une stratégie globale où la diplomatie et le calendrier politique deviennent des armes utilisées pour maximiser les gains militaires, brouiller les responsabilités, exploiter les vulnérabilités régionales et maintenir une façade internationale de respectabilité.

Mais au cœur de cette stratégie se trouve quelque chose de plus profond : les attitudes déguisées de Paul Kagame, qui nie systématiquement son implication dans la guerre en RDC, alors même que les preuves s'accumulent dans les rapports et que la communauté internationale sait pertinemment ce qu'il se passe. C'est un jeu d'ombres où tout le monde connaît la vérité, mais où la diplomatie, l'économie et les intérêts stratégiques étouffent toute condamnation ferme.

Lire La Suite

https://weimproveafrica.blogspot.com/2025/12/la-guerre-diplomatique-et-militaire-du.html

 

  

Diplomacy as a Weapon: How M23/RDF Offensives Intensify When Kagame and Tshisekedi Travel Abroad – and the Disguised Attitudes of Kagame That Everyone Knows Yet Few Dare to Confront

For more than two decades, the crisis in eastern Democratic Republic of Congo (DRC) has unfolded within a web of geopolitical manoeuvres, military strategies, diplomatic theatrics, and narratives designed to obscure responsibilities. At the centre of this complex landscape lies a phenomenon observed repeatedly by international researchers, UN investigators, diplomats, journalists, and Congolese civilians alike: M23 offensives — supported, according to numerous United Nations reports, by the Rwandan Defence Force (RDF) — intensify precisely when Rwanda's President Paul Kagame travels abroad.

A second, equally troubling dynamic has emerged in recent years: M23/RDF offensives also escalate when DRC President Félix Tshisekedi travels abroad, whether for diplomatic missions, regional summits, or bilateral engagements. These patterns are not accidental. They form part of a deliberate, multi-layered strategy in which diplomacy, political timing, and military opportunism are woven together to maximise Rwanda's influence while weakening the Congolese state.

But beneath this strategy lies something deeper: the disguised attitudes of Paul Kagame — an overt denial of involvement in Congo's war, wrapped in polished diplomacy — attitudes that everyone recognises yet few governments confront openly. This dual reality defines one of the most cynical geopolitical crises of the modern African continent.

This 3,000-word document analyses the phenomenon through three dimensions:

1.                  The intensification of M23/RDF operations during Kagame's travels, and what this reveals about Rwanda's military structure.

2.                  The escalation of attacks during Tshisekedi's foreign missions and what this exposes about Congo's institutional vulnerabilities.

3.                  Kagame's disguised attitude — a posture of denial known to all but challenged by almost none — and how it shapes international responses.

More:  https://weimproveafrica.blogspot.com/2025/12/diplomacy-as-weapon-how-m23rdf.html

--
________________________________________________________________
-Ushobora kwiyandikisha kuri iyo groupe wandikira: rwandaforum+subscribe@googlegroups.com
-Ushobora kwikura kuri iyo groupe wandikira: rwandaforum+unsubscribe@googlegroups.com
Contact: rwandaforumonline@gmail.com.
-Posting to the Group: Posting to the group:
rwandaforum@googlegroups.com
________________________________________________________________
-Africa Context:
https://improveafrica.blogspot.com/
---
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Rwanda Forum" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to rwandaforum+unsubscribe@googlegroups.com.
To view this discussion visit https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/rwandaforum/CAEe4F%3DcOrjbVQjwfcXPz%2BXePx8B5Z2CS6rEVDeXy7JBWGWt7cA%40mail.gmail.com.

Diplomacy as a Weapon: How M23/RDF Offensives Intensify When Kagame and Tshisekedi Travel Abroad

Diplomacy as a Weapon: How M23/RDF Offensives Intensify When Kagame and Tshisekedi Travel Abroad – and the Disguised Attitudes of Kagame That Everyone Knows Yet Few Dare to Confront

For more than two decades, the crisis in eastern Democratic Republic of Congo (DRC) has unfolded within a web of geopolitical manoeuvres, military strategies, diplomatic theatrics, and narratives designed to obscure responsibilities. At the centre of this complex landscape lies a phenomenon observed repeatedly by international researchers, UN investigators, diplomats, journalists, and Congolese civilians alike: M23 offensives — supported, according to numerous United Nations reports, by the Rwandan Defence Force (RDF) — intensify precisely when Rwanda's President Paul Kagame travels abroad.

A second, equally troubling dynamic has emerged in recent years: M23/RDF offensives also escalate when DRC President Félix Tshisekedi travels abroad, whether for diplomatic missions, regional summits, or bilateral engagements. These patterns are not accidental. They form part of a deliberate, multi-layered strategy in which diplomacy, political timing, and military opportunism are woven together to maximise Rwanda's influence while weakening the Congolese state.

But beneath this strategy lies something deeper: the disguised attitudes of Paul Kagame — an overt denial of involvement in Congo's war, wrapped in polished diplomacy — attitudes that everyone recognises yet few governments confront openly. This dual reality defines one of the most cynical geopolitical crises of the modern African continent.

This 3,000-word document analyses the phenomenon through three dimensions:

1. The intensification of M23/RDF operations during Kagame's travels, and what this reveals about Rwanda's military structure.
2. The escalation of attacks during Tshisekedi's foreign missions and what this exposes about Congo's institutional vulnerabilities.
3. Kagame's disguised attitude — a posture of denial known to all but challenged by almost none — and how it shapes international responses.

I. When Kagame Travels, M23 Attacks Intensify: The Anatomy of a Strategic Pattern

1. A pattern too consistent to ignore

Since the re-emergence of the M23 rebel movement in 2012 — and especially since its resurgence in 2021 — investigators have noticed a recurring pattern: whenever Paul Kagame travels abroad, M23 offensives in eastern Congo intensify noticeably.

These escalations are not random. They involve:

• the capture of strategic towns,
• the cutting of major supply routes,
• coordinated assaults on FARDC positions,
• heightened use of military drones,
• and systematic displacement of civilians.

The timing is so consistent that it has become a geopolitical indicator in itself:
Kagame in Europe or the US → M23 gains ground in North Kivu.

2. Rwanda's military structure does not depend on Kagame's physical presence

Military analysts emphasise a crucial point: Kagame does not need to be in Rwanda for the RDF-M23 machinery to operate. Rwanda's military structure is:

• highly centralised,
• rigidly disciplined,
• extremely loyal to Kagame,
• and fully capable of executing pre-defined strategies autonomously.

Decisions made at the highest level flow down a narrow, controlled chain of command. Once orders and strategic objectives are set, operations proceed without interruption — whether Kagame is in Kigali, Doha, Washington, or Paris.

Thus, the intensification of attacks during Kagame's travels does not imply that he is directing operations from an aircraft or hotel room minute by minute. Rather, it demonstrates that:

The Rwandan military system supporting the M23 remains fully active, organised, and aligned with Kagame's strategic vision, even in his physical absence.

3. Kagame's foreign trips serve as political camouflage

One of the most revealing — and disturbing — aspects of this pattern is how Kagame's foreign missions offer him a convenient political shield. When he is seen on the world stage:

• speaking about peace and stability,
• advocating for African unity,
• condemning insecurity in the region,
• or promoting Rwanda as a model of progress,

it becomes easier for him to deny any involvement in the simultaneous military escalation in Congo.

It is a simple but effective tactic:
being elsewhere to deny involvement at home.

Diplomatically, this façade is powerful. Kagame presents himself as a responsible statesman while the RDF-supported M23 expands its territorial control.

4. Kagame's disguised attitude — known to all, confronted by none

Paul Kagame's public posture regarding the Congo war follows a predictable script:

• He denies any Rwandan involvement.
• He dismisses UN reports as politically biased.
• He blames the FDLR for all instability.
• He portrays Rwanda as a misunderstood victim.
• He accuses Congo of failing to govern itself.

Yet behind closed doors, diplomats and international analysts acknowledge a very different truth:
Everyone knows Rwanda is deeply involved. Everyone knows the M23 is not an independent movement. Everyone knows the RDF supplies, trains, and sometimes directly commands its fighters.

Kagame's disguised attitude is therefore not ignorance — it is performance.
A diplomatic show.
A calculated fiction.
A mask worn deliberately because he knows the world will not challenge him seriously.

His confidence in this impunity has become part of the strategy itself.

II. When Tshisekedi Travels, M23 Makes Gains: Exploiting Congo's Structural Vulnerabilities

1. A military apparatus dependent on presidential presence

Unlike Rwanda's disciplined and vertical military, the FARDC suffers from:

• chronic underfunding,
• weak logistics,
• corruption,
• internal rivalries,
• lack of unified command,
• infiltration by foreign interests.

In such an environment, President Tshisekedi's presence is more than symbolic — it is operational. His role is crucial for:

• consolidating command structures,
• accelerating decision-making,
• coordinating political-military responses,
• maintaining pressure on senior officers.

When Tshisekedi travels abroad, the cohesion of the military apparatus weakens.

2. M23/RDF offensives intensify during these absences

M23/RDF commanders appear to understand this vulnerability perfectly. UN investigations document rapid advances of the rebel movement during periods when Tshisekedi is abroad, including:

• major assaults on FARDC positions,
• coordinated offensives targeting weakened sectors,
• seizing of towns and villages with minimal resistance,
• encirclement of strategic areas.

Examples include offensives around:

• Bunagana,
• Rutshuru,
• Tongo,
• Kishishe,
• Nyanzale,
• Mweso.

These attacks were not spontaneous but planned to coincide with moments when the Congolese political machine — already strained — becomes even less responsive.

3. A dual exploitation: Rwanda's strength vs. Congo's vulnerabilities

The contrast between the two states explains the strategic timing:

• Rwanda's system is so centralised that Kagame's absence changes nothing.
• Congo's system is so fragile that Tshisekedi's absence changes everything.

Thus, M23/RDF exploits:

• Kagame's travel as diplomatic cover,
• Tshisekedi's travel as an operational opening.

This dual mechanism allows the rebel movement to expand territorial control while avoiding immediate political consequences.

III. Kagame's Disguised Attitude: A Global Secret That Few Governments Dare Expose

1. Denial as a tool of statecraft

Kagame's behaviour in relation to Congo follows a well-crafted diplomatic choreography:

1. Deny everything.
2. Blame the FDLR.
3. Frame Rwanda as a victim.
4. Present Congo as irresponsible and chaotic.
5. Accuse UN experts of bias.
6. Promote Rwanda's image as disciplined and modern.

This formula has allowed him to maintain international partnerships, attract massive aid, and preserve his global reputation — even while international reports identify Rwanda as a destabilising force.

2. Everyone knows — and yet silence prevails

In diplomatic circles:

• ambassadors know,
• African Union officials know,
• UN representatives know,
• Western intelligence services know,
• humanitarian organisations know,
• Congolese civilians know intimately.

It is an open secret that Rwanda supports the M23.
But geopolitics — interests, alliances, minerals, military cooperation — prevents open condemnation.

Thus, Kagame's disguised attitude persists because it is politically convenient for powerful actors to look the other way.

3. Impunity as a strategic weapon

The absence of meaningful consequences emboldens the pattern:

• Offensives intensify.
• Rwanda denies involvement.
• The international community hesitates.
• The cycle repeats.

Kagame has understood that in a world driven by interests, denial is often as effective as truth, especially when backed by military power, economic networks, and control of narrative.

Conclusion: A War Fought in Three Arenas

The conflict in eastern Congo is not merely a battlefield confrontation. It is a multi-dimensional geopolitical struggle fought simultaneously across:

1. The diplomatic arena

Where Kagame uses foreign travel as political camouflage and Tshisekedi attempts to rally international support.

2. The institutional arena

Where Rwanda's disciplined system contrasts sharply with Congo's fragile military structures.

3. The psychological arena

Where Kagame's disguised attitudes — known to all, confronted by none — sustain a climate of impunity that enables the continuation of violence.

Understanding these layers is essential for any meaningful peace strategy.

References

• United Nations Group of Experts on the DRC (reports: 2012, 2013, 2014, 2018, 2022, 2023).
• Report S/2022/479 – Evidence of RDF involvement in M23 operations.
• Report S/2023/573 – Documentation of logistical supply routes between Rwanda and M23.

• Human Rights Watch (HRW), reports 2012–2024.
• Amnesty International, North Kivu conflict assessments.
• Global Witness, investigations on financial and mining networks linked to M23/RDF.

• Congo Research Group (CRG), New York University.
• International Crisis Group (ICG), reports on eastern DRC dynamics.
• Rift Valley Institute (RVI), publications on Great Lakes political-military networks.

• BBC Africa Eye, investigations on M23 and Rwanda.
• Reuters investigative dossiers on RDF deployments.
• The New York Times, geopolitical analyses of Rwanda's role.
• Le Monde (France), detailed reporting on coordinated M23 offensives.

 

La guerre diplomatique et militaire du Rwanda en RDC

La guerre diplomatique et militaire du Rwanda en RDC : intensification des offensives du M23/RDF pendant les voyages de  Paul Kagame et Felix Tshisekedi, et les attitudes déguisées d'un dirigeant dont les stratégies sont pourtant connues de tous

Depuis plus de deux décennies, la crise de l'Est de la République démocratique du Congo s'inscrit dans un jeu géopolitique complexe où les dynamiques militaires, les stratégies diplomatiques et les discours politiques se croisent, se contredisent et se masquent mutuellement. Au centre de ces contradictions se trouve un phénomène que de nombreux chercheurs, diplomates, journalistes d'investigation et organismes internationaux ont documenté : les offensives du M23 — groupe armé soutenu selon plusieurs rapports par l'armée rwandaise (RDF) — s'intensifient précisément lorsque Paul Kagame est en voyage à l'étranger.

Plus récemment, une tendance similaire a émergé : les offensives du M23/RDF s'accélèrent également lorsque le président congolais Félix Tshisekedi se trouve hors du pays, soit pour des réunions internationales, des sommets politiques ou des missions diplomatiques.

Ces deux réalités, lorsqu'elles sont combinées, dévoilent une stratégie globale où la diplomatie et le calendrier politique deviennent des armes utilisées pour maximiser les gains militaires, brouiller les responsabilités, exploiter les vulnérabilités régionales et maintenir une façade internationale de respectabilité.

Mais au cœur de cette stratégie se trouve quelque chose de plus profond : les attitudes déguisées de Paul Kagame, qui nie systématiquement son implication dans la guerre en RDC, alors même que les preuves s'accumulent dans les rapports et que la communauté internationale sait pertinemment ce qu'il se passe. C'est un jeu d'ombres où tout le monde connaît la vérité, mais où la diplomatie, l'économie et les intérêts stratégiques étouffent toute condamnation ferme.

Ce texte de 3000 mots analyse cette dynamique complexe en trois dimensions :

1. Le rôle central du Rwanda dans les opérations du M23, y compris lors des voyages de Kagame.
2. L'exploitation de la vulnérabilité congolaise lors des déplacements de Tshisekedi.
3. Les attitudes déguisées de Kagame, connues mais rarement dénoncées ouvertement.

 

I. Quand Kagame voyage, le M23 attaque : structure d'une stratégie bien rodée

1. Une intensification des offensives impossible à ignorer

Depuis 2012, et plus encore depuis la résurgence du M23 en 2021, les experts internationaux observent un phénomène troublant : chaque fois que Paul Kagame quitte le Rwanda pour une mission diplomatique à l'étranger, les attaques du M23 s'intensifient dans l'Est du Congo.

Il ne s'agit pas d'un hasard statistique. Les offensives gagnent en puissance, en coordination et en précision. Des localités stratégiques sont prises. Des axes routiers essentiels sont coupés. Les FARDC reculent. Les civils fuient.

Ces offensives suivent un schéma qui, lorsqu'il est observé sur plusieurs années, devient impossible à ignorer.

2. Une structure militaire rwandaise qui ne dépend pas de la présence physique du président

Les analystes soulignent une réalité fondamentale : la présence physique de Kagame n'est pas nécessaire pour que le système militaire rwandais continue à fonctionner à pleine puissance.

L'armée rwandaise, l'une des plus disciplinées et centralisées du continent, opère selon une chaîne de commandement verticale extrêmement loyale au président. Les objectifs stratégiques sont définis bien en amont, et le M23 reçoit — selon de nombreux rapports — :

• du soutien en renseignements,
• de la logistique,
• des armes sophistiquées,
• des officiers,
• des unités de renfort,
• des drones,
• des munitions,
• et des formations spécialisées.

Ainsi, même lorsque Kagame est dans un avion, dans un hôtel ou assis sur un panel lors d'une conférence internationale, les offensives du M23/RDF se poursuivent sans interruption.

3. L'utilisation du voyage comme masque politique

L'un des éléments les plus sensibles de cette analyse est l'usage diplomatique que Kagame semble faire de ses déplacements internationaux.

Lorsque des offensives se produisent pendant qu'il représente le Rwanda dans des sommets régionaux, des conférences de sécurité mondiale ou des rencontres bilatérales, il peut facilement affirmer n'avoir aucune responsabilité, puisqu'il se trouve physiquement loin des événements.

C'est une stratégie simple, mais diablement efficace :
être ailleurs pour mieux nier.

4. Les attitudes déguisées de Kagame, une façade qui n'abuse plus personne

Officiellement, Kagame affirme que :

• Le Rwanda n'a aucun lien avec le M23.
• Les RDF ne participent pas aux combats en RDC.
• Le problème vient des FDLR, qu'il utilise comme justification.
• Le Rwanda est un acteur de paix injustement accusé.

Mais ces discours sont devenus du théâtre diplomatique, car dans les couloirs des organisations internationales, dans les chancelleries occidentales et dans les institutions africaines, tout le monde connaît la vérité.

5. Tout le monde sait — mais personne n'agit vraiment

Les rapports de l'ONU documentent précisément le soutien militaire rwandais.
Les services de renseignement régionaux et occidentaux confirment les analyses.
Les journalistes d'investigation publient des preuves détaillées.
Les diplomates reconnaissent en privé la responsabilité du Rwanda.

Pourtant, Kagame continue de nier, avec assurance, calme et maîtrise, et cette attitude déguisée est devenue une signature politique :
un mélange de déni, d'arrogance diplomatique et de confiance totale en l'impunité internationale.

II. Quand Tshisekedi voyage, le M23 avance : exploitation des faiblesses structurelles de la RDC

1. Un appareil militaire fragile qui dépend du leadership du président

À l'opposé du Rwanda, la RDC souffre d'une armée :

• sous-équipée,
• infiltrée,
• minée par la corruption,
• affaiblie par des rivalités internes,
• et dépourvue d'une doctrine militaire claire.

Dans ce contexte, la présence du président Tshisekedi est essentielle. Elle sert de catalyseur pour l'unité du commandement, la rapidité des décisions et la mobilisation politique de l'armée.

Lorsque Tshisekedi est à l'étranger, cette cohésion se fissure.

2. Le M23/RDF profite de chaque moment de vacance politique

Les rapports montrent que :

• les FARDC réagissent moins vite,
• les ordres tardent à être exécutés,
• les officiers hésitent,
• les opérations perdent en coordination,
• les lignes de défense deviennent vulnérables.

Le M23/RDF, parfaitement informé des mouvements diplomatiques de Tshisekedi, profite de cette faiblesse temporaire pour avancer.

3. Prises de villes stratégiques pendant les voyages de Tshisekedi

À plusieurs reprises, des localités clés sont tombées précisément pendant les déplacements du président :

• Bunagana,
• Rutshuru,
• Tongo,
• Mweso,
• Kishishe,
• et d'autres encore.

Ces captures ne sont jamais accidentelles. Elles sont planifiées pour :

• humilier politiquement Tshisekedi,
• affaiblir son message diplomatique,
• créer la perception d'un État absent et impuissant,
• renforcer la position du M23 dans les négociations futures.

4. Une tactique d'opportunisme stratégique

Le Rwanda exploite ainsi deux moments favorables :

• Quand Kagame voyage, son absence sert de couverture diplomatique.
• Quand Tshisekedi voyage, son absence crée une vulnérabilité militaire.

Cette double stratégie permet d'avancer, d'occuper, de consolider des positions tout en brouillant les responsabilités.

III. Une diplomatie de façade : les attitudes déguisées de Kagame, connues mais tolérées

1. Un chef d'État qui nie l'évidence

Paul Kagame maîtrise un style politique où le déni devient une technique diplomatique :

• nier les opérations,
• ridiculiser les accusations,
• inverser les responsabilités,
• présenter le Rwanda comme victime,
• accuser les FDLR comme menace universelle.

Cette attitude, pourtant connue comme une stratégie, fonctionne parce que Kagame :

• bénéficie d'alliances puissantes,
• contrôle étroitement son image internationale,
• sait manipuler les contradictions géopolitiques,
• profite de l'indifférence ou de l'hypocrisie internationale.

2. Une vérité que « tout le monde connaît »

Dans les institutions internationales :

• les diplomates savent,
• les analystes savent,
• les experts savent,
• les ONG savent,
• les militaires savent,
• les Congolais savent.

Sans conteste, les attitudes de Kagame ne trompent personne. Elles ne sont tolérées que parce que des puissances étrangères considèrent le Rwanda comme :

• un partenaire stratégique,
• un État stable dans une région instable,
• un fournisseur de troupes pour les opérations de paix,
• un allié contre le terrorisme,
• un acteur clé pour l'exploitation minière régionale.

3. Une impunité qui nourrit la guerre

Comme aucune sanction sérieuse n'est prise :

• les opérations militaires se poursuivent,
• le M23 consolide ses positions,
• les civils continuent de fuir,
• les accusations se multiplient,
• mais le Rwanda nie encore et toujours.

Cette impunité fait partie de la stratégie.

Conclusion : une guerre qui se joue sur trois terrains

Le conflit de l'Est du Congo ne se comprend pas uniquement à travers les fusils, les drones et les tranchées. Il se joue aussi :

1. sur le terrain diplomatique, où Kagame utilise ses voyages comme un masque politique ;
2. sur le terrain institutionnel, où les absences de Tshisekedi affaiblissent temporairement la cohésion militaire de la RDC ;
3. sur le terrain psychologique, où les attitudes déguisées du Rwanda, connues de tous mais rarement dénoncées, façonnent un climat d'impunité internationale.

Il s'agit d'une guerre hybride où l'image, le timing politique, la désinformation et les alliances stratégiques sont aussi importants que les armes.

Références

Rapports des Nations Unies

• Nations Unies, Groupe d'experts sur la RDC : Rapports 2012, 2013, 2014, 2018, 2022, 2023.
• S/2022/479 – Implication d'unités RDF dans des opérations du M23.
• S/2023/573 – Documentation sur les axes logistiques entre le Rwanda et le M23.

• Human Rights Watch (HRW), rapports 2012–2024.
• Amnesty International, analyses sur la crise du Nord-Kivu.
• Global Witness – Enquêtes sur le financement du M23 et l'exploitation des minerais.

• Congo Research Group (CRG), études sur le M23 et les réseaux politico-militaires.
• International Crisis Group (ICG), publications sur la crise de l'Est de la RDC.
• Rift Valley Institute (RVI), analyses sur les dynamiques des Grands Lacs.

• BBC Africa Eye, enquêtes sur le M23 et le Rwanda.
• Reuters, reportages sur la participation rwandaise.
• New York Times, analyses géopolitiques sur la crise du Congo.
• Le Monde, dossiers sur les offensives coordonnées du M23.

 

[Rwanda Forum] Washington le 04 Décembre 2025

Triples i ( pour Inyenzi-Inkotanyi-Intore) et votre Hutu de Service OJPN Budome ( bout d'homme) petit-fils Ngurube,

Bite? Zirongeye zirariye cyangwa zirariwe? Quid du sort réservé à Paul Kaaga par ses créateurs et employeurs les Puissants Lobbies de l'Occident qui après 31 ans d'utilisation viennent de l'user jusqu'à la moelle?

https://www.echosdafrique.com/20251207-accord-de-washington-paix-annoncee-illusions-confirmees

[Rwanda Forum] Burundi: An Indispensable Actor in the Quest for Peace in the Great Lakes Region – Analysis of a Major Diplomatic Turning Point

Burundi: An Indispensable Actor in the Quest for Peace in the Great Lakes Region – Analysis of a Major Diplomatic Turning Point

Introduction

Burundi's official invitation to participate in the signing of the Washington Accords between Rwanda and the Democratic Republic of the Congo (DRC), scheduled for 4 December 2025, marks a diplomatic turning point whose significance extends far beyond the symbolic (Mwangi, 2025). This event represents not only international recognition of Burundi's stabilising role, but also a strategic repositioning within the complex geopolitics of the Great Lakes region. Long marginalised or underestimated, Burundi is now emerging as a central actor in the search for lasting peace in a region marked by decades of conflict, foreign interference, forced displacement and geopolitical rivalries.

https://weimproveafrica.blogspot.com/2025/12/burundi-indispensable-actor-in-quest.html

 

Le Burundi, un acteur incontournable dans la quête de paix dans la région des Grands Lacs : Analyse d'un tournant diplomatique majeur

Introduction

L'invitation officielle du Burundi à participer à la signature des Accords de Washington entre le Rwanda et la République démocratique du Congo (RDC), prévue pour le 4 décembre 2025, marque un tournant diplomatique dont la portée dépasse largement le cadre symbolique (Mwangi, 2025). Cet événement représente non seulement une reconnaissance internationale du rôle stabilisateur du Burundi, mais aussi un repositionnement stratégique dans la géopolitique complexe de la région des Grands Lacs. Longtemps marginalisé ou sous-estimé, le Burundi s'impose désormais comme un acteur central dans la recherche d'une paix durable dans une région marquée par des décennies de conflits, d'ingérences étrangères, de déplacements forcés et de rivalités géopolitiques.

 

More :

https://weimproveafrica.blogspot.com/2025/12/le-burundi-un-acteur-incontournable.html

 

 

--
________________________________________________________________
-Ushobora kwiyandikisha kuri iyo groupe wandikira: rwandaforum+subscribe@googlegroups.com
-Ushobora kwikura kuri iyo groupe wandikira: rwandaforum+unsubscribe@googlegroups.com
Contact: rwandaforumonline@gmail.com.
-Posting to the Group: Posting to the group:
rwandaforum@googlegroups.com
________________________________________________________________
-Africa Context:
https://improveafrica.blogspot.com/
---
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Rwanda Forum" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to rwandaforum+unsubscribe@googlegroups.com.
To view this discussion visit https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/rwandaforum/CAEe4F%3Dcs1L8OHuAorBU%2BLOY0g%3DVHxPRkCBBGxiGXq6S%2B2Lgekw%40mail.gmail.com.

Burundi: An Indispensable Actor in the Quest for Peace in the Great Lakes Region – Analysis of a Major Diplomatic Turning Point

Introduction

Burundi's official invitation to participate in the signing of the Washington Accords between Rwanda and the Democratic Republic of the Congo (DRC), scheduled for 4 December 2025, marks a diplomatic turning point whose significance extends far beyond the symbolic (Mwangi, 2025). This event represents not only international recognition of Burundi's stabilising role, but also a strategic repositioning within the complex geopolitics of the Great Lakes region. Long marginalised or underestimated, Burundi is now emerging as a central actor in the search for lasting peace in a region marked by decades of conflict, foreign interference, forced displacement and geopolitical rivalries.

International Recognition of Burundi's Role

Burundi's invitation to a bilateral agreement between Rwanda and the DRC constitutes an exception in diplomatic practice. Ordinarily, such negotiations are conducted behind closed doors, between the two directly concerned states and mediating powers. The fact that Burundi has been invited alongside Kenyan President William Ruto demonstrates that its diplomatic position has been strengthened to the point of being perceived as a guarantee of stability and credibility (Odongo, 2025). International partners now recognise that any lasting solution to the crises in eastern DRC must necessarily include Burundi.

This recognition is the fruit of the Burundian government's consistent commitment to regional security. Burundi deployed troops to eastern DRC as part of the East African Community Regional Force (EACRF) in March 2023, demonstrating its capacity to intervene in a disciplined and professional manner (East African Community, 2023). Regional partners consider the Burundian army, strengthened by its international experience gained notably in Somalia under AMISOM, to be one of the best prepared in the fight against armed groups, particularly in difficult areas such as South Kivu (Maina, 2023).

Burundi as a Natural Mediator in a Deeply Rooted Crisis

The crisis in eastern DRC cannot be reduced to a simple military confrontation; it forms part of a complex historical configuration involving border issues, ethnic rivalries, illegal exploitation of natural resources, geopolitical ambitions and the involvement of foreign actors. The current conflict, marked by the resurgence of the March 23 Movement (M23) since 2021, experienced dramatic escalation in January 2025 with the rebel capture of Goma and Bukavu, supported according to UN reports by thousands of Rwandan soldiers (Wikipedia, 2025a).

Burundi, unlike other states in the region, has no expansionist ambitions nor direct economic interests in the conflict. This neutrality confers a major diplomatic advantage: being perceived as a credible mediator, capable of listening, reassuring and bringing positions closer together. Over the years, Bujumbura has strengthened its relations with both Kinshasa and Kigali, whilst preserving its strategic independence.

An Indispensable Military Presence in the Future Regional Order

An Operational and Respected Army

The Burundian National Defence Forces (FDNB) have deployed between 8,000 and 12,000 soldiers in eastern DRC, distributed across sixteen battalions operating primarily in South Kivu (African Security Analysis, 2025). Their presence has proved decisive in stabilising the region, particularly against M23's advance. Unlike other foreign forces operating in the DRC, the Burundian army enjoys a largely positive perception amongst local populations and Congolese authorities, being considered disciplined, effective and faithful to its security mandate (SOS Médias Burundi, 2025).

This military effectiveness has made Burundi indispensable in the current security dynamic. Burundian forces have contributed to blocking the advance of violent rebel movements, securing key border areas, supporting the Armed Forces of the DRC (FARDC) in recapturing strategic localities, and reducing attacks against civilian populations. Without the Burundian presence, the security equation in South Kivu would be considerably more unstable.

A Pragmatic and Clear Foreign Policy

Unlike other governments in the region, often criticised for their interference or opaque agendas, Burundi has adopted a diplomacy of transparency, dialogue and non-aggression. This positioning reassures international partners who see Burundi as a stability factor rather than a source of tension. Burundi is one of the few countries in the region to be accused neither of pillaging Congolese natural resources nor of supporting rebel groups operating against its neighbours.

A Unique Capacity to Engage with All Actors

Burundi maintains contacts with various communities, governments and regional organisations, enabling it to play a bridging role. Its detailed knowledge of the region's politico-ethnic dynamics also enables it to intervene where other countries would be perceived as biased. This balanced position explains why the United States, as organisers of the Washington Accords, deemed it essential to invite Burundi to this historic signing.

4 December 2025: A Symbolic Date for Burundian Diplomacy

When the Washington Accords signing ceremony takes place on 4 December 2025, it will not merely be a protocol gesture. The Washington Accords, initially signed by foreign ministers in June 2025, aim for the withdrawal of Rwandan troops from eastern DRC and the Congolese government's eradication of the Democratic Forces for the Liberation of Rwanda (FDLR) militia, whilst establishing a framework for regional economic integration based on critical minerals trade (Wikipedia, 2025b).

This will be a moment of international validation of Burundi's role in regional stabilisation. Its presence will confirm that it is no longer a mere observer of Great Lakes region dynamics, but a guarantor and key partner in developing lasting solutions. Burundi will also be able to defend its vision of inclusive peace, based on combating foreign interference, strengthening national capacities, regional cooperation and protecting civilian populations.

Burundi's Security Concerns Regarding Regional Ambitions

Beyond its commitment to regional stability, Burundi also acts out of concern for its own national security. In Bujumbura, numerous political and military officials believe that if Rwanda succeeds in consolidating its influence or controlling the entire Kivu region, this could create a major strategic imbalance on Burundi's borders.

In Burundian security circles, the dominant analysis is clear: if Rwanda extends its military and political control over eastern DRC, it will possess strategic depth enabling it to exert direct pressure on Burundi, or even threaten its stability. Kivu would then become a rear base for projecting influence, weakening Burundian positions or supporting groups hostile to Bujumbura's government.

The RED-Tabara Question and Tensions with Rwanda

Burundi considers that the RED-Tabara armed group (Resistance for Rule of Law in Burundi) was created, supported and used by Rwanda as an instrument of destabilisation against its government. Created in 2015 following a failed military coup, RED-Tabara is estimated to have between 500 and 800 fighters operating from South Kivu in the DRC (Hajayandi, 2024).

This conviction is based on numerous elements identified by Burundian security services over the years, notably repeated attacks launched from Rwandan territory and the presumed training of fighters inside Rwanda. UN Group of Experts reports confirmed in 2016 that captured RED-Tabara members stated they had been recruited in refugee camps in Rwanda and trained by people in Rwandan military uniforms (Hajayandi, 2024).

RED-Tabara attacks have intensified since late 2023, notably the deadly Gatumba attack in December 2023 which killed at least 20 people. In response to these events, President Évariste Ndayishimiye accused Rwanda of financing and training RED-Tabara rebels (VOA News, 2023). Consequently, and faced with the progressive deterioration of bilateral relations, the border between Burundi and Rwanda has been closed since January 2024, illustrating the extreme level of mistrust between the two countries (The East African, 2024).

This closure also constitutes a protective measure for Burundi, which seeks to prevent infiltrations by armed groups capable of threatening its internal stability. Rwanda's alleged support for RED-Tabara can be interpreted as an effort to undermine Burundi's military support to the DRC in its struggle against M23 (Hajayandi, 2024).

A New Chapter for the Great Lakes Region

Burundi's invitation to participate in the Washington Accords marks a genuine shift in regional balance. For a long time, the Rwanda-Uganda axis dominated the politico-military scene in the Great Lakes. Today, a new actor – Burundi – is asserting itself with growing influence, responsible diplomacy and a capacity to inspire confidence.

This repositioning could contribute to building a new regional order, founded on cooperation rather than confrontation, and on solidarity rather than competition. Burundi now represents a model of political and diplomatic resilience, capable of transforming its own complex past into a force for regional stability.

The signing of the Washington Accords on 4 December 2025, in the presence of Burundian President Évariste Ndayishimiye alongside his Rwandan counterpart Paul Kagame and Congolese counterpart Félix Tshisekedi, symbolises this new geopolitical reality. It enshrines Burundi's role not only as a stabilising military force on the ground, but also as an indispensable diplomatic partner in building lasting peace in the Great Lakes region.

Conclusion

Burundi's invitation to the Washington Accords of 4 December 2025 reflects a profound transformation of the geopolitical landscape in the Great Lakes region. This international recognition rests on three fundamental pillars: a professional and respected army, pragmatic and balanced diplomacy, and concrete commitment to regional security without an expansionist agenda.

Burundi now appears as an indispensable actor whose military presence in South Kivu has contributed to stabilising a critical security situation. Its capacity to maintain relations with all regional actors, whilst preserving its strategic independence, makes it a credible mediator in a conflict where geopolitical, economic and ethnic interests intertwine in complex ways.

In a context where M23, supported by Rwanda according to UN reports, now controls extensive territories including Goma and Bukavu, and where more than 6.7 million people have been displaced, Burundi's stabilising role becomes all the more crucial. The Washington Accords, which aim to end decades of conflict in eastern DRC, cannot ignore an actor who contributes concretely to reducing violence on the ground.

History may remember 4 December 2025 as the day when Burundi moved from a marginal position to that of a central actor in the Great Lakes peace architecture. This evolution demonstrates a country's capacity to transform its internal challenges into diplomatic opportunities and to establish itself as a stabilising force in one of Africa's most complex regions.

---

References

African Security Analysis (2025) Burundi intensifies its military involvement in Eastern DRC. Available at: https://www.africansecurityanalysis.org/updates/burundi-intensifies-its-military-involvement-in-eastern-drc (Accessed: 4 December 2025).

East African Community (2023) The Republic of Burundi deploys its troops to Eastern DRC. Available at: https://www.eac.int/nairobi-process-activities/military-track/2938-the-republic-of-burundi-deploys-its-troops-to-eastern-drc (Accessed: 4 December 2025).

Hajayandi, P. (2024) 'Burundi-Rwanda rivalry: RED-Tabara rebel attacks add to regional tensions', The Conversation, 25 April. Available at: https://theconversation.com/burundi-rwanda-rivalry-red-tabara-rebel-attacks-add-to-regional-tensions-225801 (Accessed: 4 December 2025).

International Crisis Group (2022) 'East Africa's DR Congo force: the case for caution', ReliefWeb, 25 August. Available at: https://reliefweb.int/report/democratic-republic-congo/east-africas-dr-congo-force-case-caution (Accessed: 4 December 2025).

Maina, C. (2023) 'East Africa's peace mission in the DRC: why it's in Burundi's interest to help', The Conversation, 27 November. Available at: https://theconversation.com/east-africas-peace-mission-in-the-drc-why-its-in-burundis-interest-to-help-203486 (Accessed: 4 December 2025).

Mwangi, N. (2025) 'DRC-Rwanda leaders head to Washington for final peace deal with Trump', Peoples Dispatch, 2 December. Available at: https://peoplesdispatch.org/2025/12/02/drc-rwanda-leaders-head-to-washington-for-final-peace-deal-with-trump/ (Accessed: 4 December 2025).

Odongo, J.S. (2025) 'VP Alupo arrives in Washington as regional leaders gather for historic DR Congo-Rwanda peace signing', Nile Post, 4 December. Available at: https://allafrica.com/stories/202512040168.html (Accessed: 4 December 2025).

SOS Médias Burundi (2025) 'South Kivu in flames: widespread clashes between M23, FARDC, and Burundian troops two days before a peace agreement in Washington', 3 December. Available at: https://www.sosmediasburundi.org/en/2025/12/03/south-kivu-in-flames-widespread-clashes-between-m23-fardc-and-burundian-troops-two-days-before-a-peace-agreement-in-washington/ (Accessed: 4 December 2025).

The East African (2024) 'Burundi-Rwanda rivalry: RED-Tabara rebel attacks add to regional tensions', 16 April. Available at: https://www.theeastafrican.co.ke/tea/news/east-africa/red-tabara-rebel-attacks-add-to-regional-tensions-4591914 (Accessed: 4 December 2025).

United Nations News (2025) 'Security Council urges Rwanda to stop supporting M23 in eastern DR Congo', 22 February. Available at: https://news.un.org/en/story/2025/02/1160406 (Accessed: 4 December 2025).

VOA News (2023) 'Burundi's president says Rwanda is backing rebels fighting against his country', 30 December. Available at: https://www.voanews.com/a/burundi-s-president-says-rwanda-is-backing-rebels-fighting-against-his-country-/7418259.html (Accessed: 4 December 2025).

Wikipedia (2025a) March 23 Movement. Available at: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/March_23_Movement (Accessed: 4 December 2025).

Wikipedia (2025b) 2025 Democratic Republic of the Congo–Rwanda peace agreement. Available at: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/2025_Democratic_Republic_of_the_Congo–Rwanda_peace_agreement (Accessed: 4 December 2025).